New & Used Laser Imager

Market Value Calculator
 
Please Note: Search results for this device do not include the following devices, please select the relevant device if it is of interest to you: Printer, Thermal
 
 
 
 
Item Details
Seller details
Item Price (USD)
Year manufactured

Quick Look

 
Device: Laser Imager
Manufacturer: Kodak
Model: DryView 8100
Premium User
Location: United States, Washington
Business type: Dealer
Rating: 89%
2,240
This Seller accepts Escrow as a payment method
-

Quick Look

 
Device: Laser Imager
Manufacturer: Kodak
Model: DryView 8150
Premium User
Location: United States, Washington
Business type: Dealer
Rating: 89%
880
This Seller accepts Escrow as a payment method
-

Quick Look

 
Device: Laser Imager
Manufacturer: Kodak
Model: DryView 5800
Premium User
Location: United States, Washington
Business type: Dealer
Rating: 89%
7,895
This Seller accepts Escrow as a payment method
-

Quick Look

 
Device: Laser Imager
Manufacturer: Kodak
Model: DryView 8150
Location: Argentina, Buenos Aires
Negotiable
This Seller accepts Escrow as a payment method
-

Quick Look

 
Device: Laser Imager
Manufacturer: Kodak
Model: DryView 8900
Location: United States, California
3,500
2005

Quick Look

 
Device: Laser Imager
Manufacturer: Kodak
Model: DryView 8700
Location: United Kingdom, Worcestershire
Business type: Refurbishing Company
1,891
-

Quick Look

 
Device: Laser Imager
Manufacturer: Kodak
Model: DryView 8100
Location: Italy, Naples
Business type: Service Company
2,243
2002

Quick Look

 
Device: Laser Imager
Manufacturer: Kodak
Model: DryView 8700
Location: Italy, Naples
Business type: Service Company
2,243
2001

Quick Look

 
Device: Printer, Thermal
Manufacturer: Agfa
Model: DRYSTAR 3000
Location: United States, New York
Business type: Dealer
4,000
This Seller accepts Escrow as a payment method
2003

Quick Look

 
Device: Laser Imager
Manufacturer: Fuji
Model: FM-DPL
Location: United States, New York
Business type: Dealer
5,000
2002

Quick Look

 
Device: Laser Imager
Manufacturer: Kodak
Model: DryView 8700
Location: Czech Republic, Ustecky
Business type: Exporter
396
2002

Quick Look

 
Device: Laser Imager
Manufacturer: Konica Minolta
Model: DryPro 832
Location: United States, Texas
Business type: Imaging Center
8,000
2009

Quick Look

 
Device: Laser Imager
Manufacturer: Kodak
Model: DryView 8700
Location: Germany, Brandenburg
Business type: Dealer
Negotiable
1999

Quick Look

 
Device: Laser Imager
Manufacturer: Kodak
Model: DryView 8100
Location: Germany, Hamburg
Business type: Broker
Negotiable
-

Quick Look

 
Device: Laser Imager
Manufacturer: 3M Health Care
Model: DryView 8800
Location: United States, Minnesota
Business type: Dealer
Rating: 80%
Negotiable
This Seller accepts Escrow as a payment method
-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5
The model & manufacturer of the marked items have changed due to an acquisition between companies, and are also known as:
Current Manufacturer / Model Name Alternative Manufacturer / Model Name
Imation / DryView 8700 Kodak / DryView 8700
3M Health Care / DryView 8700 Kodak / DryView 8700

Laser Imager may also be referred to as :

X-ray Printer | Recorder, Laser Film | Laser Printer | Laser Film Printer | Laser Camera | Dry Camera | Wet Laser Camera | Multi-format Camera

Didn't find the medical device you're looking for? Post a Buying Request
A buying lead is an excellent way to reach worldwide medical equipment sellers!
  • Fill in a simple form, giving us details about the medical device you are searching for.
  • Receive competitive quotes from global sellers that have the item you are searching for in their inventory.
  • Choose the best and most suitable quote for you!
Post a Buying Request >>
 

Tips for buying Laser Imager

  1. Laser Imagers can be divided into wet and dry processing categories, and then further divided into system throughput, depending on a facility's demand.
  2. The dry processing laser printer units eliminate the facility's pollution concerns and the need to process chemicals, and therefore are advantageous over wet-processing systems. Some other benefits include: less maintenance costs - such as darkroom ventilation, chemical storage, and additional plumbing, electricity, and drainage. Also, dry processing laser printing systems can be strategically placed almost anywhere in a facility because of their compact nature.
  3. A dry processing laser imaging system may be a cost-effective solution for a facility that is upgrading or purchasing new equipment. Facilities that are already using wet processing equipment usually stick with it; the film is well produced, the conversion from one system to another can be too costly, and the radiologists are comfortable with the stability of developing by wet processing systems.
  4. Laser imagers of all categories should have eight input ports, pixel matrix size should be 4000 × 5000 for high and low throughput imagers and 2000 × 2500 for small format imagers.
  5. All laser printers should be able to record about 4,000 shades of gray.
  6. In nuclear medicine departments, the dry small format laser imager is most commonly used.
  7. Facilities must first determine the necessary throughput of the system based on the current patient load. They should also make sure that the laser printer's system's memory and throughput can handle the number of imaging devices that will be connected to it.
  8. Low-throughput laser imagers should average 60 films/hour, while high throughput imagers should average 120 films/hour, while low-throughput laser printers should average 60 films/hour.
  9. For high-throughput laser imagers, the average print time should be about 20 seconds/film, and about 60 seconds/film for low-throughput imagers.
  10. Dry small format laser imagers, used specifically for NM and ultrasound, average the same throughput as low throughput imagers. They need a smaller film size than high and low throughput imagers, using 20 × 25 cm films.
  11. For all laser imagers, local hard-drive storage is recommended. In order to accommodate various images, imagers should have multiple formats.
  12. Users need to follow calibration procedures recommended by the manufacturer for acceptable long-term performance.
  13. All units should offer remote diagnostics. To increase system compatibility, DICOM interface options are recommended.
  14. ACR/NEMA DICOM 3.0 is a standard that ensures data exchange among laser imaging devices, regardless of the brand or image format used. The purpose of this standard is that several devices meeting the standard could be organized into a system that communicates without customized interfaces.
  15. Facilities may find a DICOM compliant system more compatible with existing laser printing equipment, especially DICOM gray scale conformance.